Posts Tagged ‘fashion lunacy’
Friday, May 29th, 2009

photo via inkytwist
First off, what’s up with the length? You can’t wear this as a dress, which means you’re forced to wear it with jeans. Or pants. Or leggings. Which is frightful. Secondly, drawstring and zipper? Fur hood and sleeveless? This garment has some serious multiple personality disorder.
Tags: fashion lunacy, what's wrong with this picture?
Posted in daily posts | No Comments »
Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

photo via anniemole
Truth be told, I started the day with a vendetta against snakeskin. I was standing innocently at my busstop when I spied a woman next to me, dressed entirely in business casual but for her skirt, which was a calf-length masterpiece of roses over snakeskin-printed silk. Seriously. No lie. I’m not entirely sure if that is a sin worse than wearing tights with shorts, or shorts with heels (only acceptable if you are Beyonce), but it’s pretty damn close.
Tags: fashion lunacy, no... just NO, ugly shoes
Posted in daily posts | 2 Comments »
Monday, May 18th, 2009

photo via lobstar
Well. The floral print blouse certainly is interesting — it’s a shame that it’s nearly obscured by a vest made from the cobwebs of spiders on steroids. What really intrigues me, though, are the mismatched earrings… One of which appears to be a bunch of fake grapes. Yum?
Tags: fashion lunacy, no... just NO
Posted in daily posts | No Comments »
Thursday, May 14th, 2009

photo via chasingfun
I wasn’t going to mention the clashing & rather (in comparison) Lilliputian-looking purse, or the possibly snake-skin high heels, or the tiara, or the Bluetooth headset which looks kind of like a demonic, brain-sucking hot pink chile pepper. I was going to write about the weird cut of the top, but it hit me: it’s a jumpsuit. It’s a one-piece jumpsuit with the sides cut out. Oh. My. God.
Tags: c'mon guys, fashion lunacy, no... just NO
Posted in daily posts | 3 Comments »
Monday, May 11th, 2009

photo via gingher
One of my favourite Go Back & Change one-liners is “It’s like _______ went and threw up/horked/puked all over her shirt.” Any suggestions for this vintage atrocity? I’m thinking the Musicians of Bremen. Or that story about the wheelchair girl and the blonde-braid girl in the Alps. Heidi?
Tags: c'mon guys, fashion lunacy
Posted in daily posts | 2 Comments »
Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

photo via loriwright
I know this is on a mannequin, insulting whom isn’t really my usual gig, but I couldn’t let this photo go on living a peaceful life on Flickr… I just couldn’t. I mean, look at it. It’s awkward enough on a hanger — like a dandy mated with a dot matrix printer — imagine how it will look when you stick some breasts, hips, and an optional fat roll or two under it. My God, the humanity…
Tags: dear god, fashion lunacy, mannequin rehab, no... just NO
Posted in daily posts | No Comments »
Thursday, April 30th, 2009

photo via newbirth
As the photographer astutely pointed out, you would be able to see cooch if it weren’t for the blessing of this woman’s large thighs. Which isn’t an excuse! Bring back bloomers.
Tags: bring sexy back please, dear god, fashion lunacy, what's wrong with this picture?
Posted in daily posts | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

photo via 23bit_grrrl
Are those shapes… drawn on?
Tags: c'mon guys, clashing combo, fashion lunacy
Posted in daily posts | No Comments »
Monday, April 6th, 2009

photo via kjdm
I don’t have anything against pink, really. Or against hair accessories. Or even against pink hair accessories. What I do have a problem with is spending $30 dollars on something that’s been pulled out of a peacock’s ass and glued to a barrette.
Tags: bridesmaid's hell, european != fashionable, fashion lunacy, the mirror is your friend
Posted in daily posts | No Comments »
Monday, March 30th, 2009

photo via malingering
These are
- tangled bedsheets
- extremely high-waisted sweat-shorts worn low on the hips
- “harem pants,” which the latest issue of Cosmopolitan assures me can be fashionably worn by every woman.
Tags: bring sexy back please, fashion lunacy, no... just NO, what's wrong with this picture?
Posted in daily posts | 1 Comment »